REC operational status (updated May 17, 2024 8:30AM EDT) - REC will be in "mostly normal" operations today. Emails are preferred over phone calls. REC will be in limited operations on Monday May 20, 2024 due to family priorities. Phone support may not be available but email will be monitored. We anticipate normal operations through most of the rest of the week (subject to change). Thank you for your patience.

LPFM Channel Search Tool Now Supports FCC "Channel Floors" Proposal

The LPFM Channel Search Tool now gives you the option to remove pending Auction 83 (Great Translator Invasion) translators in designated markets proposed for dismissal under the FCC's "Channel Floors" proposal in the recent Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

When you access the LPFM Channel Search Tool, select the option "Exclude translators proposed to be dismissed by the FCC in the July, 2011 NPRM.". We will be adding more functionality across the other tools, such as Broadcast Query, at a later time.

LPFM Channel Search Tool status as a result of the announced NPRM.

Does the upcoming LPFM/Translator NPRM invalidate LPFM Tool search results or just provide more opportunities?

The current production version of the LPFM Channel Search Tools (both the PC based and mobile) assume by default that all pending translator applications are still in place. This means that any proposed plan that would suggest a new LPFM opportunity would have application priority against any existing facility record (even if just a pending original construction permit application), the tool would only display fewer opportunities then what may be possible.

FCC votes to promote NPRM to allow LPFM using a "market based" approach. REC statement on issues raised.

This morning, the full Federal Communications Commission has voted unanimously to promote a further notice of proposed rulemaking (FNPRM) that will:

Statement of Michi Eyre: Prometheus v FCC decision

Today's decision in the 3rd Circuit was a major victory for localism, women, people of color and the overall public interest.

The court acknowledges what many of us knew all along, that the FCC's broadcast ownership restrictions are too lax and do nothing to promote diversity in ownership and programming.

While we, the public have achieved this victory, it is only one stepping stone. We must continue to close the gaps in broadcast law that preclude local organizations, minority groups and local ministries from being able to use local broadcast spectrum to convey their message because of national interests.

LPFM/GTI: NPRM on FCC Agenda 7/12

According to an article in All Access, the next FCC open meeting will include a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) related to the future licensing of LPFM and FM Translators as a result of the Local Community Radio Act.

This meeting is scheduled for July 12 and will be streamed.

FCC proposing changes to public file requirements

NOTE: Comments are due June 17

The Federal Communications Commission is inviting public comment to reduce paperwork burden by proposing changes to public files kept by commercial and non-commercial radio and TV stations. LPFM stations are not required to keep a full public file but are required to keep a political file.

This proposal is not a Notice for Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and therefore there is docket number at this time.

REC Position Statement: Pirate Radio

REC feels that one of the primary motivators of radio piracy is to address the fact that local commercial and non-commercial radio is not addressing the needs of the minority audiences of the community in question.

REC does not condone radio piracy as transmission systems may not use equipment that is of sound engineering practice and due to the lack of coordination in spectrum use as it could create harmful interference, both inside and outside the broadcast band.

REC Statement: Jose Luis Sin Censura

Broadcasted hate speech is still broadcasted hate speech, no matter the language spoken. For many years, non-English broadcasting, especially Spanish language broadcasting has been a hotbed of hate speech and obscenity. Some may say its because no one from the government is listening in their language while others may say its because those in the minority communities may not be aware of the complaint process. Those who defend this speech on radio and TV state that it is a different culture.

Pages

Subscribe to REC Networks RSS