Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • REC Home
  • Apply
    • REC Services Rate Card & Policies
    • LPFM Construction Completed
    • LPFM License Modification
    • New FM Booster Station
    • New Class D FM Station in Alaska
    • New Low Power FM (LPFM) Station
  • Initiatives
    • RM-11846: Rural NCE Stations
    • RM-11909: LP-250 / Simple 250
    • WIDE-FM
    • RM-11952: Translator Reform
    • RM-11843: 8 Meter Ham Band
    • PACE - LPFM Compliance
  • Services
  • Tools
    • Today's FCC Activity
    • Broadcast Data Query
    • Field strength curves
    • Runway slope
    • Tower finder
    • FM MODEL-RF Exposure Study
    • More tools
    • Developers - API
  • LPFM
    • Learn about LPFM
      • Basics of LPFM
      • Self Inspection Checklist
      • Underwriting Compliance Guide
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • FCC Rules for LPFM
      • HD Radio for LPFM
      • Transmitters certified for LPFM
      • Interference from FM translators
      • RadioDNS for LPFM Stations
    • 2023 Window REC Client Portal
    • myLPFM - LPFM Station Management
    • LPFM Station Directory
    • Spare call signs
    • REC PACE Program
    • More about LPFM
  • Reference
    • Pending FCC Applications
    • FCC Filing Fees
    • Radio License Renewal Deadlines
    • FCC Record/FCC Reports
    • Pirate Radio Enforcement Data
    • Premises Info System (PREMIS)
    • ITU and other international documents
    • Recent FCC Callsign Activity
    • FCC Enforcement Actions
    • Federal Register
    • Recent CAP/Weather Alerts
    • Legal Unlicensed Broadcasting
    • More reference tools
  • LPFM Window
  • About
    • REC in the Media
    • Supporting REC's Efforts
    • Recommendations
    • FCC Filings and Presentations
    • Our Jingles
    • REC Radio History Project
    • Delmarva FM / Riverton Radio Project
    • J1 Radio / Japanese Broadcasting
    • Japan Earthquake Data
    • REC Systems Status
    • eLMS: Enhanced LMS Data Project
    • Open Data at REC
    • Our Objectives
  • Contact

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Statement of REC Networks

Operational Status

Michi on YouTube

Most popular

fcc.today - real time updates on application activity from the FCC Media Bureau.  fccdata.org - the internet's most comprehensive FCC database lookup tool.  myLPFM.com - Low Power FM channel search and station management tool.  REC Broadcast Services - professional LPFM and FM translator filing services. 

Other tools & info

  • Filing Window Tracking
  • Enforcement Actions
  • REC Advisory Letters
  • FAQ-Knowledge Base
  • U/D Ratio Calculator
  • Propagation Curves
  • Runway Slope/REC TOWAIR
  • Coordinate Conversion
  • PREMIS: Address Profile
  • Spare Call Sign List
  • FCC (commercial) filing fees
  • Class D FM stations in Alaska
  • ARRR: Pirate radio notices
  • Unlicensed broadcasting (part 15)
  • FMmap - broadcast atlas
  • Federal Register
  • Rate Card & Policies
  • REC system status
  • Server Status
  • Complete site index
Cirrus Streaming - Radio Streaming Services - Podcasting & On-demand - Mobile Apps - Advertising

Statement of REC Networks

By admin | 6:24 PM EDT, Mon September 28, 2020

In order to protect the integrity of the LPFM service by preventing commercial influence through speculation and “shadow ownership” (control of a station by an undisclosed third party), REC has filed Informal Objections against applications where it was supsected that speculative behavior was taking place. In other words, a single party filing for multiple facilities with the intention of either building a radio network or to sell the permits to other parties for a profit. 

It is important to remember that LPFM does have a national ownership cap of one station (with exceptions for tribal entities and public safety agencies).  REC supports the national ownership cap and we will defend it from speculators and others who choose to abuse the system.

In the 2013 LPFM window, REC filed informal objections against hundreds of applications including a large group that was originated through the same person with corporations formed just prior to filing, all filings in the same state and all with similar sounding names. Many of these stations used names that gave them the appearance of Hispanic Christian organizations. 

Throughout the proceedings that followed the filing of the applications and our original objections, in responsive pleadings and objections to subsequently filed applications, REC was painted by opposing counsel as an organization that hates Hispanics and hates Christians.  In a separate proceeding for Foundation for A Beautiful Life, REC was painted as anti-Asian.  We find that strange since we have been programming Asian music for over 20 years on a noncommercial basis in order to promote cultural understanding and appreciation. 

It is important to realize that while a large number of the applicants for which REC filed objections against in the 2013 window had cookie cutter names that sounded like Hispanic Christian ministries, we never targeted any race or religion.  It is important to remember that REC also filed objections against applicants who were not Hispanic and proposed secular names and educational statements. We only cared about how they filed, not where their ancestrial hertiage is from nor what god they worship.  This is not how REC operates.  Yet, some are very quick to play the race card when they have nothing else to hold on to.

In cases where we filed an objection and then was able to verify the parties to the application, we would withdraw the objection to permit the grant and in some cases, those stations would turn to REC for further assistance.

As a result of the objections filed against these applications, we have uncovered attempts to sell stations under the table in Miami, Costa Mesa CA and other places.  We identified applications where no facility was ever built.  We called attention to the issue of this kind of filing that goes against the spirit of the LPFM service.  These filings also influenced the Commission to investigate these applicants and as a result, change the rules on site assurance after it was independently determined that many of the speculative applications never obtained assurance from tower owners and were aribtrarily dropped into locations. 

Unresolved applications and objections remain in Charlotte, Albuquerque, Baton Rouge and Norfolk, VA.  Today, the license application for a station outside of Pittsburgh was dismissed after it was shown by someone local that the facility was never built. 

As we go forward to another window sometime in the next 2 years or so, we need to be aware that some of the same “players” who were in the 2013 and 2000/2001 LPFM windows may be back to try again.  The FCC can only do so much within the confines of the law, but now, they will be more aware of it.

In the next window, the local community needs to get involved. The applications that got the most action taken on them in light of objections were those where there was local involvement. Local testimony carries weight at the FCC.  I am not prepared to say what REC’s involvement will be in the next window on this front, but we are watching and we are developing tools to assure that our “one to a customer” rule that we have in LPFM is properly followed.

REC has a policy of working with stations regardless of their language, heritage of the parties, religion or political views.  Where we draw the line is when the spirit of the rules are being compromised, no matter who is doing it.

REC Essentials

  • FCC.TODAY
  • FCCdata.org
  • myLPFM Station Management
  • REC site map

The More You Know...

  • Unlicensed Broadcasting
  • Class D Stations for Alaska
  • Broadcasting in Japan
  • Our Jingles

Other REC sites

  • J1 Radio
  • REC Delmarva FM
  • Japan Earthquake Information
  • API for developers

But wait, there's more!

  • Join NFCB
  • Pacifica Network
  • LPFM Wiki
  • Report a bug with an REC system

Copyright © REC Networks - All Rights Reserved
EU cookie policy

Please show your support by using the Ko-Fi link at the bottom of the page. Thank you for supporting REC's efforts!