Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • REC Home
  • Apply
    • REC Services Rate Card & Policies
    • LPFM Construction Completed
    • LPFM License Modification
    • New FM Booster Station
    • New Class D FM Station in Alaska
    • New Low Power FM (LPFM) Station
  • Initiatives
    • RM-11846: Rural NCE Stations
    • RM-11909: LP-250 / Simple 250
    • WIDE-FM
    • RM-11952: Translator Reform
    • RM-11843: 8 Meter Ham Band
    • PACE - LPFM Compliance
  • Services
  • Tools
    • Today's FCC Activity
    • Broadcast Data Query
    • Field strength curves
    • Runway slope
    • Tower finder
    • FM MODEL-RF Exposure Study
    • More tools
    • Developers - API
  • LPFM
    • Learn about LPFM
      • Basics of LPFM
      • Self Inspection Checklist
      • Underwriting Compliance Guide
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • FCC Rules for LPFM
      • HD Radio for LPFM
      • Transmitters certified for LPFM
      • Interference from FM translators
      • RadioDNS for LPFM Stations
    • 2023 Window REC Client Portal
    • myLPFM - LPFM Station Management
    • LPFM Station Directory
    • Spare call signs
    • REC PACE Program
    • More about LPFM
  • Reference
    • Pending FCC Applications
    • FCC Filing Fees
    • Radio License Renewal Deadlines
    • FCC Record/FCC Reports
    • Pirate Radio Enforcement Data
    • Premises Info System (PREMIS)
    • ITU and other international documents
    • Recent FCC Callsign Activity
    • FCC Enforcement Actions
    • Federal Register
    • Recent CAP/Weather Alerts
    • Legal Unlicensed Broadcasting
    • More reference tools
  • LPFM Window
  • About
    • REC in the Media
    • Supporting REC's Efforts
    • Recommendations
    • FCC Filings and Presentations
    • Our Jingles
    • REC Radio History Project
    • Delmarva FM / Riverton Radio Project
    • J1 Radio / Japanese Broadcasting
    • Japan Earthquake Data
    • REC Systems Status
    • eLMS: Enhanced LMS Data Project
    • Open Data at REC
    • Our Objectives
  • Contact

Breadcrumb

  • Home

Operational Status

Michi on YouTube

Most popular

fcc.today - real time updates on application activity from the FCC Media Bureau.  fccdata.org - the internet's most comprehensive FCC database lookup tool.  myLPFM.com - Low Power FM channel search and station management tool.  REC Broadcast Services - professional LPFM and FM translator filing services. 

Other tools & info

  • Filing Window Tracking
  • Enforcement Actions
  • REC Advisory Letters
  • FAQ-Knowledge Base
  • U/D Ratio Calculator
  • Propagation Curves
  • Runway Slope/REC TOWAIR
  • Coordinate Conversion
  • PREMIS: Address Profile
  • Spare Call Sign List
  • FCC (commercial) filing fees
  • Class D FM stations in Alaska
  • ARRR: Pirate radio notices
  • Unlicensed broadcasting (part 15)
  • FMmap - broadcast atlas
  • Federal Register
  • Rate Card & Policies
  • REC system status
  • Server Status
  • Complete site index
Cirrus Streaming - Radio Streaming Services - Podcasting & On-demand - Mobile Apps - Advertising

REC Statement: Nomination of Nathan Simington to FCC

By admin | 10:38 AM EDT, Tue September 22, 2020

With the upcoming vacancy on the Federal Communications Commission as a result of the end of Commissioner O’Rielly’s term that has not been renewed by the President, the current administration has the right to nominate someone to serve as a Commissioner at the FCC.  It is important to remember that the Commission consists of two members from the majority party and two from the minority party and the Chairman, who reflects the majority party at the time.

Last week, the President has announced that he plans to nominate Nathan Simington, a senior advisor at the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to fill Commissioner O’Rielly’s seat.  Prior to being at the NTIA, SImington, a Michigan Law School graduate, was senior counsel at Brightstar Corporation, a company that provided services and equipment to wireless carriers. 

The Trump administration, through the NTIA, has advanced a petition, known as RM-11862, that would get the Commission to examine the responsibilities of large social media providers like Facebook and Twitter and their status in the curation and delivery of news stories and how they should be handled in respect to §230 of the Communications Act.  While O’Reilly’s re-nomination was blocked over FCC actions that would permit a company to use spectrum adjacent to GPS for terrestrial broadband, O’Reilly has been outspoken in the past defending the First Amendment rights of the large social media providers.

A significant part of REC Networks’ early history was the pioneering of what we refer to today as “microsystems”, which we define as interactive telephone-based systems, that operate on a small scale, that have many of the characteristics of the modern day social media networks. Very few of these microsystems exist today.  REC’s “no-politics” policy has caused us to proceed with caution in participating in RM-11862.

REC is only concerned that a president (regardless of party), has nominated someone to serve on the Commission solely for the advancement of a single issue.  This leaves us with questions about positions on other issues that are of interest to the modern REC including noncommercial educational broadcasting (including the projected future filing windows), Amateur Radio, a citizen’s ability to access spectrum, the provision of broadcasting and broadband services to rural areas and greater ownership diversity, including in the noncommercial educational broadcast segment.

When the FCC was first created in 1934, it was divided into three divisions: broadcasting, telephone and telegraph. Times have changed from that original “trinity” and now broadcasting is merely a blip on the FCC’s radar.  We consider that “blip” to be very important.  Likewise, we can understand when those who are nominated to the FCC come from backgrounds that relate to modern technology and may hold limited knowledge in the subjects of the 1934 “trinity”.

While we are concerned that this placement is merely to promote the current administration on a single major item (Section §230 and the display of news items on social media networks), we will have five years to work with whomever is confirmed and “bring them up to speed” on the issues that concern REC.

We have said time and time again; LPFM, NCE broadcasting and the other issues that REC addresses are not “liberal” issues, nor are they “conservative” issues.  They concern the public at large. We consider LPFM as a bipartisian service.  This was confirmed with the McCain/Cantwell co-sponsorship of the Local Community Radio Act of 2010. 

Whomever is confirmed for the FCC, we hope that they pick some knowledgable people to be their staff advisors on various topics.  The staff advisors are the “eyes and ears” for the Commissioners on various subjects.  If Simington is confirmed, we look forward to building a relationship with his chosen advisors on Media and Wireless Telecommunications Bureau issues. 

Let’s start with an open mind and a clean slate and let’s see where this can go.  Obviously, actions can lead to further scruitny. We still have a concern over the selection, timed in harmony with RM-11862, but overall, we hope for the best where it comes to broadcasting and other modern issues in REC’s direct jurisdiction.

REC Essentials

  • FCC.TODAY
  • FCCdata.org
  • myLPFM Station Management
  • REC site map

The More You Know...

  • Unlicensed Broadcasting
  • Class D Stations for Alaska
  • Broadcasting in Japan
  • Our Jingles

Other REC sites

  • J1 Radio
  • REC Delmarva FM
  • Japan Earthquake Information
  • API for developers

But wait, there's more!

  • Join NFCB
  • Pacifica Network
  • LPFM Wiki
  • Report a bug with an REC system

Copyright © REC Networks - All Rights Reserved
EU cookie policy

Please show your support by using the Ko-Fi link at the bottom of the page. Thank you for supporting REC's efforts!