Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • REC Home
  • Apply
    • REC Services Rate Card & Policies
    • LPFM Construction Completed
    • LPFM License Modification
    • New FM Booster Station
    • New Class D FM Station in Alaska
    • New Low Power FM (LPFM) Station
  • Initiatives
    • RM-11846: Rural NCE Stations
    • RM-11909: LP-250 / Simple 250
    • WIDE-FM
    • RM-11952: Translator Reform
    • RM-11843: 8 Meter Ham Band
    • PACE - LPFM Compliance
  • Services
  • Tools
    • Today's FCC Activity
    • Broadcast Data Query
    • Field strength curves
    • Runway slope
    • Tower finder
    • FM MODEL-RF Exposure Study
    • More tools
    • Developers - API
  • LPFM
    • Learn about LPFM
      • Basics of LPFM
      • Self Inspection Checklist
      • Underwriting Compliance Guide
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • FCC Rules for LPFM
      • HD Radio for LPFM
      • Transmitters certified for LPFM
      • Interference from FM translators
      • RadioDNS for LPFM Stations
    • 2023 Window REC Client Portal
    • myLPFM - LPFM Station Management
    • LPFM Station Directory
    • Spare call signs
    • REC PACE Program
    • More about LPFM
  • Reference
    • Pending FCC Applications
    • FCC Filing Fees
    • Radio License Renewal Deadlines
    • FCC Record/FCC Reports
    • Pirate Radio Enforcement Data
    • Premises Info System (PREMIS)
    • ITU and other international documents
    • Recent FCC Callsign Activity
    • FCC Enforcement Actions
    • Federal Register
    • Recent CAP/Weather Alerts
    • Legal Unlicensed Broadcasting
    • More reference tools
  • LPFM Window
  • About
    • REC in the Media
    • Supporting REC's Efforts
    • Recommendations
    • FCC Filings and Presentations
    • Our Jingles
    • REC Radio History Project
    • Delmarva FM / Riverton Radio Project
    • J1 Radio / Japanese Broadcasting
    • Japan Earthquake Data
    • REC Systems Status
    • eLMS: Enhanced LMS Data Project
    • Open Data at REC
    • Our Objectives
  • Contact

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • FCC rulemaking documents for LPFM
  • 99-25: Memorandum Opinion and Order on Reconsideration (09/22/2000)
  • II. Issue Analysis (5-105)
  • G. Other Issues (101-105)

Operational Status

Michi on YouTube

Most popular

fcc.today - real time updates on application activity from the FCC Media Bureau.  fccdata.org - the internet's most comprehensive FCC database lookup tool.  myLPFM.com - Low Power FM channel search and station management tool.  REC Broadcast Services - professional LPFM and FM translator filing services. 

Other tools & info

  • Filing Window Tracking
  • Enforcement Actions
  • REC Advisory Letters
  • FAQ-Knowledge Base
  • U/D Ratio Calculator
  • Propagation Curves
  • Runway Slope/REC TOWAIR
  • Coordinate Conversion
  • PREMIS: Address Profile
  • Spare Call Sign List
  • FCC (commercial) filing fees
  • Class D FM stations in Alaska
  • ARRR: Pirate radio notices
  • Unlicensed broadcasting (part 15)
  • FMmap - broadcast atlas
  • Federal Register
  • Rate Card & Policies
  • REC system status
  • Server Status
  • Complete site index
Cirrus Streaming - Radio Streaming Services - Podcasting & On-demand - Mobile Apps - Advertising

G. Other Issues (101-105)

  1. Public File and Ownership Reporting.  We deny a request by UCC that we impose public file and ownership reporting requirements on LPFM licensees.[1]  As a general matter, we agree with UCC’s assertion that these are important sources of citizen information about a station’s programming, ownership, and compliance with Commission rules.[2]  As we have already stated in the Report and Order, however, these requirements would impose a burden that is out of proportion to the small noncommercial nature of the stations.  We also continue to believe that the community-oriented nature of the stations’ service further reduces the justification for such requirements.  We are not swayed by UCC’s argument that nonlocal entities, which may hold LPFM licenses after the initial two years of licensing, will not have an incentive to be responsive to their communities.  The unknown extent of such nonlocal ownership and the nature of resulting operations do not warrant the imposition of a disproportionate burden on all LPFM licensees at this time.
  2. Low Power Advisory Committee.  We will not establish a low power advisory committee as suggested by the Amherst Alliance.[3] LPFM broadcasters and other interested parties are free, of course, to form a private organization to promote LPFM, support and assist its members and their operations, and address technical issues with each other and, where appropriate, raise them with the Commission.  Amherst Alliance has not raised a compelling reason, however, for governmental institution of such an organization at this time. 
  3. Automatic Program Review.  We will not establish an “automatic program review” as also urged by the Amherst Alliance.[4]  It is possible that, in time, our experience with LPFM, as with any new service, will lead us to consider changes in our rules to enhance the quality of the radio service the public receives.  Amherst specifically suggests that we plan to revisit our determinations to require 2nd adjacent channel separations, to require “buffer zones” in our channel separations, and to reject low power AM service.[5]  They also suggest we consider authorizing 250 watt service in small cities and rural areas, and adjusting wattage ceilings in some urban environments.[6]  Although we are open to proposing, or considering proposals, to revise our rules after we have had experience with the service, we do not find it necessary to commit now to a review in the future.
  4. Transfers of Control – Nonstock Entities.  In the Report and Order, we established that LPFM licenses (and licensees) cannot be sold or transferred to another entity.  We will here clarify, in response to Colorado Christian University’s Petition for Reconsideration, that the gradual change of a governing board or membership body to the point that a majority of its members are new since the authorization was granted will not, by itself, constitute a prohibited transfer of control. This policy is consistent with the Commission’s practice in responding to these gradual changes in nonstock entities when they occur for full-power NCE licensees.[7]
  5. Regulatory Flexibility.  As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., a Supplemental Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has been completed and is attached as Appendix B hereto.
 

[1]              See UCC Petition.

[2]              Report and Order, 15 FCC Rcd at 2277, ¶ 185.

[3]              Amherst Petition at 2.

[4]              Amherst Petition at 4.

[5]              Amherst Petition at 2-6.

[6]              Amherst Petition at 6.

[7]              See Notice of Inquiry, MM Docket No. 89-77 (Transfers of Control of Certain Licensed Non-Stock Entities), 4 FCC Rcd 3403 (1989).

Book traversal links for G. Other Issues (101-105)

  • ‹ F. Point System for Resolving Mutually Exclusive Applications (97-100)
  • Up
  • III. Conclusion / IV. Procedural Matters and Ordering Clauses (106-112) ›

REC Essentials

  • FCC.TODAY
  • FCCdata.org
  • myLPFM Station Management
  • REC site map

The More You Know...

  • Unlicensed Broadcasting
  • Class D Stations for Alaska
  • Broadcasting in Japan
  • Our Jingles

Other REC sites

  • J1 Radio
  • REC Delmarva FM
  • Japan Earthquake Information
  • API for developers

But wait, there's more!

  • Join NFCB
  • Pacifica Network
  • LPFM Wiki
  • Report a bug with an REC system

Copyright © REC Networks - All Rights Reserved
EU cookie policy

Please show your support by using the Ko-Fi link at the bottom of the page. Thank you for supporting REC's efforts!